I have a condition in my code where I have sets of value which have same handling. Now I have implemented it using switch, but have used fallthrough init.
Sample Code
function validateSwitch() {
var value = document.getElementById("txt").value;
switch (value) {
case "a":
case "b":
case "c":
console.log("Foo");
break;
case "d":
case "e":
case "f":
console.log("Bar");
break;
default:
console.log("Default");
break;
}
}
function validateIf() {
var value = document.getElementById("txt").value;
if (value === 'a' || value === 'b' || value === 'c') {
console.log("Foo");
} else if (value === 'd' || value === 'e' || value === 'f') {
console.log("Foo");
} else {
console.log("Default");
}
}
<input type="text" id="txt">
<button onclick="validateSwitch()">Switch</button>
<button onclick="validateIf()">If</button>
In above code, there are 2 approaches, validateSwitch and validateIf. Question is, which one is a better approach/ideal. Does fallthrough impacts readability of the code?
Note: This is just a sample with dummy values. Actual values are different.
Thanks in advance.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire